Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
2.2
|
Minor security fixes |
19-Oct-2008 04:01 |
|
2.1
|
Minor security fixes |
24-Sep-2008 14:31 |
|
2.0
|
Major feature enhancements |
11-Aug-2008 23:47 |
|
2.0 Release Candidate 4
|
Major feature enhancements |
01-Aug-2008 06:51 |
|
2.0 Release Candidate 2
|
Major feature enhancements |
21-Jul-2008 02:27 |
|
1.10 beta 1
|
Major feature enhancements |
06-Mar-2008 06:42 |
Comments
[»]
A response to common questions / concerns about Tiki
by Marc Laporte - Jun 2nd 2007 21:00:25
If you are evaluating Tiki, please read:
http://marclaporte.com/TikiSucks
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Its getting there
by records guru - Nov 10th 2006 06:41:56
I can say that I am really impressed with this CMS app. Awesome Job. As
stated before, Search Engine Friendly Urls would be great. A great way to
generate more publicity is would to develop a "Digg Clone" module
similar to Pligg
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Feature list with auto-evaluation by the Tiki community
by Marc Laporte - Jun 7th 2006 19:39:10
Some people are very happy with Tiki, some not.
Please see:
http://dev.tikiwiki.org/tiki-index.php?page=Features
[reply]
[top]
[»]
rewrite engine?
by Achim der Merath - May 17th 2006 05:19:37
Searchengine friendly url
like much other projekts have as clickable standart is missing
please force this for the next release.
--
let things flow
Achim
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: rewrite engine?
by Achim der Merath - May 17th 2006 23:56:17
> Searchengine friendly url....
>
ok i know the input rewrite is htaccess - it works and seams to be ok
BUT the outgoing is not implemented
but this is the mainpart of a SEFURL
so
i searched and found TikiURLt
http://www.coofercat.com/wiki/TikiURLt
on my local linuxserver it works 1.9.3 and 1.10 (the tar.gz above)
on a vserver it doesn't
it's crashing becource some problems with the cache
Warning: mkdir(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/tmp/71) is not
within the allowed path(s):......
(/srv/web/:/srv/www/htdocs/phpMyAdmin/:/srv/www/htdocs/confixx/html/gesperrt/)
in /srv/web/html/wiki/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 1551
this message repeats about x100 times
--
let things flow
Achim
[reply]
[top]
[»]
extremely great software as CMS
by kamyl - Jan 17th 2006 06:33:09
Hi there! :)
I recently started using TikiWiki as CMS for one of my sites. Now I'm so
impressed of it's features that I started considering to convert all of my
sites using other OpenSource CMS to TikiWiki. :) This software is truly
awesome!
[reply]
[top]
[»]
almost, but not quite
by tonemono - Dec 12th 2004 17:46:31
tikiwiki would be perfect for a project that I have in mind except for one
thing; I couldn't make it run under php5.
I even tried deinstalling php5 (in freebsd) and installing php4, but that
just broke all of my other sites and that wasn't a compromise I was willing
to make.
In the meantime I'll keep looking for alternatives like Framewerk and waiting for tikiwiki to
support php5
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: almost, but not quite
by Breadcrust - Jan 28th 2005 03:41:08
> tikiwiki would be perfect for a project
> that I have in mind except for one
> thing; I couldn't make it run under
> php5.
Give TikiPro a shot
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: almost, but not quite
by Marc Laporte - May 20th 2005 06:05:15
> tikiwiki would be perfect for a project
> that I have in mind except for one
> thing; I couldn't make it run under
> php5.
> I even tried deinstalling php5 (in
> freebsd) and installing php4, but that
> just broke all of my other sites and
> that wasn't a compromise I was willing
> to make.
> In the meantime I'll keep looking for
> alternatives like Framewerk and waiting
> for tikiwiki to support php5
Hi!
Thank you for the kind words. "perfect for a project that I have in
mind"
About supporting php5. Many users have reported using Tiki with PHP5
successfully since 5.0 More info at http://tikiwiki.org/TikiwikiPHP5
Please report bugs and we will try to fix them :-)
Best regards,
M ;-)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Looks good, but works bad
by andersa - Feb 25th 2004 14:43:55
This CMS has everything but the kitchen sink, and
documentation. Chances are that whatever you want from a
content mannagement system, tiki will provide it, on condition
that you can figure out how to configure it. The learning curve
was way too steep for me. Add the fact that there is no
documentation except for installation docs, and you will be
effectively lost.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
We are working on better documentation!
by Marc Laporte - Mar 16th 2004 22:26:41
Thanks for your comments.
We have flash videos to learn how to configure/setup:
http://tikiwiki.org/tiki-listmovies.php
And a dedicated documentation site:
http://doc.tikiwiki.org/
Community help on IRC:
http://tikiwiki.org/ConnectingToIrc
Thanks!!
M ;-)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: We are working on better documentation!
by Steve - Jun 16th 2004 01:56:39
The doc.tikiwiki site has been very slow in updating the documentation and
by the time tikiwiki 1.9 arrives I'm sure the documentation for 1.8 will be
no-where near complete.
I feel that there is more interest in rushing on and developing more
features etc. than in concentrating on a good stable version of Tikiwiki,
with good quality documentation.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: We are working on better documentation!
by Marc Laporte - May 20th 2005 07:01:21
> The doc.tikiwiki site has been very slow
> in updating (...) more interest in rushing on (...)
> (...) than in concentrating on a good
> stable version of Tikiwiki (...)
Hi!
Yes, I agree we should have better documentation. Since it is a wiki, you
can contribute easily. Please help us make it better. We have also worked
hard to make Tiki more intuitive (especially the admin panels in Tiki 1.9)
so documentation is less important. (But it still is, of course!)
However, I am concerned with your comment which could let a reader think
Tiki is unstable. We have three branches. You choose if you want more
stability or to access the newer features.
Tiki 1.9.0 was in development for well over a year and used on
tikiwiki.org for 10 months before it was released.
Tiki powers tens of thousands of websites and Intranets. Search google for
the following string:
"/tiki-index.php" and you will see :-)
Best regards,
M ;-)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Tiki turns one!
by Marc Laporte - Oct 7th 2003 17:10:36
What a tremendous first year!!!
I'd like to thank all the contributors for making Tiki a great project and
a great community. Special thanks to Luis Argerich who started all this!!
We deserve to be proud of what has been accomplished. And the perspectives
for the future are very bright.
Please see full article.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Tiki Rocks!
by Larry - Oct 9th 2003 18:10:59
Before starting with Tiki looked at most of the CMS, portals etc (and I
wanted to stay with phpBB) but Tiki has so much integration that it is
unbeatable.
Now we need to get that forum updated :-)
Larry
[reply]
[top]
[»]
kitchensink
by Tom - Oct 3rd 2003 06:15:04
This is a great software, and I have several sites running on it.
It is, however, overloaded with features. I can think of nobody who would
ever use all of them, and half of them would possibly be better off as
standalone products. In result, the recent versions have become somewhat
bloated and slow.
If you are looking for a "do-everything" system for your
website, chances are you've found it.
If you're looking for a simple wiki or small CMS system, there are leaner
and meaner alternatives.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: kitchensink
by ruddykins - Jun 8th 2004 17:07:16
"This is a great software ... It is, however, overloaded with features. I
can think of nobody who would ever use all of them ... recent versions have
become somewhat bloated and slow."
I suggest a services/app manager that dynamically loads/unloads "modules"
of the (sub-)apps as needed.
That way the 4-way server with 4GB of RAM, and 1 TB of HD space gets all
the features it needs (dynamically even), and the home user running his
personal TikiWiki off his PIII 450 with DSL, simply for himself and his
club of friends dosen't have to choke on too much of the app when he only
uses 2 or 3 of the apps.
Just my 2 bits (I really have no idea how difficult this would be to
implement, but it seems to be an excellent effeciency model used by the
Linux Kernel to compile some items into the kernel, and some to load a
modules upon demand.)
--
-Ruddykins
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: kitchensink
by ohertel - Oct 12th 2004 13:36:39
>
> I suggest a services/app manager that
> dynamically loads/unloads "modules" of
> the (sub-)apps as needed.
>
That's what's being worked on currently. :-)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Stop Looking; You Found it!
by Smudley - Jul 18th 2003 21:28:23
I've tried all the 'nukes' and 'xoops' and even though each one had it's
own good qualities, Tiki took my breath away!
It's truly amazing that in just a short period of time that this program
could have so many rich features.
Tiki, without a doubt, is going to be a 'household name' in the CMS arena.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Tiki is the best PHP-based CMS I've found
by Dennis Heltzel - May 5th 2003 13:05:23
I looked at a lot of PHP-based CMSs and decided Tiki is the best for a
number of reasons, but the real "clincher" is that the
developer/support community is so responsive.
This is already a mature product in the sense that "stuff just
works", but the amount of new development, driven by user requests, is
really great.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
incredible
by Dennis Daniels - Jan 10th 2003 16:38:59
I'm continually amazed and impressed by the rapid addition of new functions
to tiki. I would recommend it for review to anyone looking for a CMS
package.
[reply]
[top]
|
